MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A CCL2-Based Fusokine as a Novel Biopharmaceutical for the Treatment of CCR2-Driven Autoimmune Diseases

2010· review· en· W2042283337 on OpenAlexafffund
Moutih Rafei, Jacques Galipeau

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Immunology · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Research Foundation
KeywordsCCR2Homing (biology)ChemokineCCL2Chemokine receptorImmunologyCCR1MonocyteImmune systemInflammationCC chemokine receptorsMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoimmune diseases represent one of the most challenging clinical entities with unmet medical needs, so the continued development of novel therapeutics is well justified. Most autoimmune diseases are marked by the infiltration of lymphomyeloid cells in target tissues, leading to inflammation and tissue damage. This process is guided by chemokines that act as signaling bridges amidst a complex network of immune cells. For example, monocytes are believed to be the primary cell type responsible for pathology initiation and tissue damage, while T lymphocytes are thought to orchestrate the process by secreting more cytokines/chemokines to amplify leukocyte homing. Many studies have addressed the molecular basis of monocyte recruitment in different autoimmune diseases, and the conclusions pointed to a major role played by monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), also known as CC chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), and its cell-surface receptor, CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 2. These findings suggest that by interfering with CCL2 or its receptor, it is possible to inhibit the progression of CCR2-dependent diseases. Therefore, future therapy design targeting a maladapted immune response could target chemokine receptors starting with the CCL2-CCR2 axis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in ImmunologySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207