Effet de la déshydratation partielle par osmose sur la qualité de filets de truite mouchetée (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) pendant l'entreposage à l'état congelé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
la qualité de filets de truite mouchetée (Salvelinus fontinalis) pendant l'entreposage à l'état congelé L.Têvi Adambounou * , B. Diouf SUMMARY Effect of partial osmotic dehydration on the quality of Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) fillets during frozen storageThis research was aimed at studying influence of the temperature and solute concentration over net mass transfer during the partial dehydration by osmosis of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) fillets.The osmotic solutions used, were the mixture of NaCl and sucrose, in a weighted ratio of (2:1).The dehydration temperature and the concentration of the solute had a significant effect on water loss and solute uptake by fish fillets.Mass transfert between the solutions used and fish fillets were more important during the first 45 minutes.A stationary phase is achieved at about 2 hours of dehydration process.Also, the combined effects of the water loss, solute uptake, and freezing temperature on the quality of the fillets over the period of six months of storage at -20°C have been examined.Proteins extractibility shows more important decrease (P ≤ 0.05) in the partially dehydrated fillets compared to their controls, except when the temperature of dehydration and the freezing process are respectively, 10°C and -10°C.Furthermore this phenomena was more marqued when weighted ratio NaCl/ sucrose was important (P ≤ 0.05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".