MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043436901 · doi:10.1139/g02-015

Two-gene systems of vernalization requirement and narrow-sense earliness in einkorn wheat

2002· article· en· W2043436901 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chikako Shindo, Tetsuo Sasakuma, Naoko Watanabe, Kazuhiko Noda

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVernalizationBiologyHeading (navigation)GeneticsLocus (genetics)Quantitative trait locusGeneAlleleCommon wheatChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genetic segregation of the heading trait was analyzed using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) of einkorn wheat, RILWA-1, derived from cultivated Triticum monococcum L., and wild-type T. boeoticum Boiss. The latency to heading was examined in 115 lines under controlled environmental conditions, as well as in the field, and the degrees of narrow-sense earliness and vernalization requirement were evaluated for quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis. Single-marker analysis using 107 RFLP markers segregating in RILWA-1 detected 20 linking markers for heading factors. In all marker loci, the alleles for early heading were conferred by T. monococcum. In interval analysis of chromosome 5Am, two vernalization genes, Vrn-Am1 and Vrn-Am2, were precisely mapped to the Xcdo504-Xpsr426 interval on the central region of the long arm and to the Xwg114-Xwec87 interval on its distal region, respectively. Interval analysis also showed that two genes for narrow-sense earliness, designated Nse-3Am and Nse-5Am, were located on chromosome 3Am and 5Am, respectively. It was noticed that heading time in the field was determined mainly by Nse-3Am, suggesting that narrow-sense earliness is critical for heading in the field in einkorn wheat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207