MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043466583 · doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00148

Novel avian leukosis virus-related endogenous proviruses from layer chickens: Characterization and development of locus-specific assays

2009· article· en· W2043466583 on OpenAlexafffund
A. David Smith, Bernhard F. Benkel

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of Agriculture
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsEndogenous retrovirusBiologyGenomeLong terminal repeatEndogenyGeneticsLocus (genetics)GeneVirusVertebrateVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the course of evolution, vertebrate genomes have been invaded and colonized by retroviruses. In humans, for example, endogenous retroviruses (long terminal repeat elements) occupy roughly twice as much sequence space as essential genes. There are numerous reports in the literature implicating endogenous proviruses in the modulation of host physiology. The fact that many of these host-virus interactions take place in a proviral locus-specific manner speaks to the need for rapid assays for element profiling. This report deals with the identification of novel elements belonging to a family of endogenous retroviruses, designated ALVE, that reside in the genome of the chicken and that are closely related to exogenous avian leukosis viruses. The study of ALVE elements in the chicken genome serves as a model system for understanding the interplay between endogenous viruses and their vertebrate hosts in general, including humans. In this report, we present locus-specific, diagnostic PCR-based assays for 2 novel ALVE elements. In addition, we characterize the proviral structures and examine the genomic environments of both novel elements along with a previously described element known as ALVE-NSAC-3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207