Determination of spot size and acid diffusion length in positive chemically amplified resist for e-beam lithography at 100 and 5 kV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental method to determine the beam spot size and the acid diffusion length of a positive chemically amplified electron-beam resist (p-CAR) is proposed. This method is applied to a reference p-CAR with a Vistec VB6 electron beam at 100 kV and with a MAPPER tool at 5 kV. Beam spot size characterization is based on the width measurement of a single line exposure. This procedure is applied to two specific dose ranges. In the first one, the chemical mechanism occurring in the exposed resist is dominated by acid catalytic deprotection of a partially protected polymer (standard process). In the second dose range, the chemistry is governed by the cross-linking mechanism due to the intentional overdose of the p-CAR, leading to a polarity inversion. The authors assume that comparing the results obtained with the standard and the cross-linked p-CAR enables the determination of the acid diffusion length of the p-CAR process. This hypothesis was verified with measurements performed with a nonchemically amplified process. A relationship between the best exposure latitudes achieved at 5 and 100 kV and the minimum spot sizes determined with the present method is observed with very high resolution grating exposures. In this work, a suitable method is proposed for fine resist process characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".