MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045170985 · doi:10.1021/bi100659s

Catalytic Role of the Conformational Change in Succinyl-CoA:3-Oxoacid CoA Transferase on Binding CoA,

2010· article· en· W2045170985 on OpenAlexafffund
M.E. Fraser, Koto Hayakawa, William D. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological diseases and metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsThioesterChemistryCovalent bondTransferaseEnzymeStereochemistryActive siteConformational changeCatalysisThiolActive centerEnzyme catalysisCysteineSubstrate (aquarium)BiochemistryOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catalysis by succinyl-CoA:3-oxoacid CoA transferase proceeds through a thioester intermediate in which CoA is covalently linked to the enzyme. To determine the conformation of the thioester intermediate, crystals of the pig enzyme were grown in the presence of the substrate acetoacetyl-CoA. X-ray diffraction data show the enzyme in both the free form and covalently bound to CoA via Glu305. In the complex, the protein adopts a conformation in which residues 267-275, 280-287, 357-373, and 398-477 have shifted toward Glu305, closing the enzyme around the thioester. Enzymes provide catalysis by stabilizing the transition state relative to complexes with substrates or products. In this case, the conformational change allows the enzyme to interact with parts of CoA distant from the reactive thiol while the thiol is covalently linked to the enzyme. The enzyme forms stabilizing interactions with both the nucleotide and pantoic acid portions of CoA, while the interactions with the amide groups of the pantetheine portion are poor. The results shed light on how the enzyme uses the binding energy for groups remote from the active center of CoA to destabilize atoms closer to the active center, leading to acceleration of the reaction by the enzyme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicNeurological diseases and metabolismFrench-language works237,207