<i>Retracted: </i>Autonomous histopathological regression of primary tumours associated with specific immune responses to cancer antigens
Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneous histopathological regression of cancer has been reported. The involvement of the immune system in such regression has been advocated, leading to the theory of immunological surveillance against cancer. A prediction of this theory is that common tumour antigens can be recognized upon repeated exposure by cell-mediated immunity, which leads to tumour regression and the subsequent appearance of tumour antigen-loss variants. However, no direct evidence has been provided in non-viral-induced experimental animal models of primary malignancy or in human primary cancer. This study examined two groups of melanoma patients where histopathological regression of the primary tumour was observed. Many of the 23 patients with multiple (> or =3) primary melanomas showed significant regression of their last melanoma (median 33%, mean 40) compared with matched melanomas from patients with a single primary melanoma (median 0%, mean 12) (p=0.0080), or compared with their first primary melanoma (p=0.0013). Regression was consistent with an 'immunization effect' seen in murine tumour transplantation studies, where inoculation with > or =3 asynchronous tumours induces transplantation rejection on subsequent challenge. A significant decrease in the expression of the melanoma common tumour antigen MART-1 in the last primary tumour from multiple melanoma patients (median 8%, mean 24) versus matched single melanoma patients (median 79%, mean 68) (p=0.0041) and in the last versus first tumour in multiple primary patients was found (p=0.0083). Metastases from 17 patients whose primary skin melanomas had completely regressed (occult primary melanoma) also showed significant MART-1 loss (median 0%, mean 11) compared with matched metastases from patients with non-regressing primary melanoma (median 51%, mean 50) (p=0.0013). MART-1 antigen-loss variants observed in the multiple primary and occult primary patients correlated with the presence of peripheral blood MART-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) (p=0.03). No similar effects were observed with two other melanoma antigens, gp100 and CD63. Thus, in two groups of human melanoma patients, evidence is provided for histopathological tumour regression associated with cancer immune surveillance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".