MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thermodynamics of Interactions of TAlPyP4 and AgTAlPyP4 Porphyrins with Poly(rA)poly(rU) and Poly(rI)poly(rC) Duplexes

2006· article· en· W2045379103 on OpenAlexaff
Ara Ghazaryan, Yeva B. Dalyan, Samvel G. Haroutiunian, Volodya I. Vardanyan, Robert K. Ghazaryan, Tigran V. Chalikian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersInternational Science and Technology Center
KeywordsPorphyrinChemistryIntercalation (chemistry)StackingCircular dichroismNucleic acidPolynucleotideCrystallographyLigand (biochemistry)StereochemistryPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We employed UV light absorption and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopic measurements to study the binding of novel water-soluble porphyrins meso-tetra-(4N-allylpyridyl)porphyrin [TAlPyP4], and its Ag containing derivative to the poly(rA)poly(rU) and poly(rI)poly(rC) RNA duplexes. Our results suggest that TAlPyP4 associate with the duplexes via intercalation, whereas the conservative CD spectra indicates that AgTAlPyP4 preferably binds via outside self-stacking mode. We used our determined binding isotherms for each ligand-RNA binding event to calculate the binding constant, Kb, and binding free energy, DeltaGb = -RTlnKb. By performing these experiments as a function of temperature, we evaluated the van't Hoff binding enthalpies, DeltaH. The binding entropies, DeltaSb, were calculated as DeltaSb = (DeltaHb - DeltaGb)/T. We interpret our data in terms of specific interactions that stabilize/destabilize each ligand-RNA complex studied in this work. Taken together, our data provide important new information about the thermodynamics of interactions of porphyrins with nucleic acids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomolecular Structure and DynamicsSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207