MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045601151 · doi:10.4161/21688362.2014.970940

Connecting metabolism to intestinal barrier function: The role of leptin

2014· article· en· W2045601151 on OpenAlexaff
Gwenola Le Dréan, Jean‐Pierre Segain

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Barriers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyAdherens junctionTight junctionParacellular transportActin cytoskeletonLeptinRHOABarrier functionSignal transductionBiologyIntestinal epitheliumActin remodelingCytoskeletonCell junctionIntestinal mucosaEpitheliumCellEndocrinologyInternal medicineCadherinBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structure and function of the intestinal epithelial barrier (IEB) are dependent upon the integrity of junctional protein structures sealing the apical surface between epithelial cells. Tight junctions (TJ) and the surrounding apical F-actin cytoskeleton are involved in the regulation of paracellular permeability. The regulation of actin cytoskeleton organization by RhoA/Rho-kinase (ROCK) pathway plays an important role in TJ assembly and function. There is mounting evidence that the adipocyte-derived hormone leptin exerts pleiotropic effects on the intestinal epithelium including nutrient absorption, epithelial growth, inflammation and injury. Leptin activates multiple cell signaling pathways in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) that can explain these pleiotropic effects. However, these pathways are also involved in the primary role of leptin that is the regulation of energy and glucose metabolism homeostasis. In this commentary, we examine how the interplay between leptin signaling pathways that regulate cell metabolism could impact upon IEB function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTissue BarriersSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207