Studies of Protein−DNA Interactions by Capillary Electrophoresis/Laser-Induced Fluorescence Polarization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein-DNA interactions were studied on the basis of capillary electrophoretic separation of bound from free fluorescent probe followed by on-line detection with laser-induced fluorescence polarization. Changes in electrophoretic mobility and fluorescence anisotropy upon complex formation were monitored for the determination of binding affinity and stoichiometry. The method was applied to study the interactions of single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) with synthetic oligonucleotides and single-stranded DNA. Increases in fluorescence anisotropy and decreases in electrophoretic mobility upon their binding to SSB were observed for the fluorescently labeled 11-mer and 37-mer oligonucleotide probes. Fluorescence anisotropy and electrophoretic mobility were used to determine the binding constants of the SSB with the 11-mer (5 x 10(6) M(-1)) and the 37-mer (23 x 10(6) M(-1)). Alternatively, a fluorescently labeled SSB was used as a probe, and the formation of multiple protein-DNA complexes that differ in stoichiometry was observed. The results demonstrate the applicability of the method to study complex interactions between protein and DNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".