Role of Arginine Residues in the Active Site of the Membrane-Bound Lytic Transglycosylase B from <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lytic transglycosylases cleave the beta-(1-->4)-glycosidic bond in the bacterial cell wall heteropolymer peptidoglycan between the N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues with the concomitant formation of a 1,6-anhydromuramoyl residue. On the basis of both sequence alignments with and structural considerations of soluble lytic transglycosylase Slt35 from Escherichia coli, four residues were predicted to be involved in substrate binding at the -1 subsite in the soluble derivative of Pseudomonas aeruginosa membrane-bound lytic transglycosylase MltB. These residues were targeted for site-specific replacement, and the effect on substrate binding and catalysis was determined. The residues Arg187 and Arg188, believed to be involved in binding the stem peptide on MurNAc, were shown to play an important role in substrate binding, as evidenced by peptidoglycan affinity assays and SUPREX analysis using MurNAc-dipeptide as ligand. The Michaelis-Menten parameters were determined for the respective mutants using insoluble peptidoglycan as substrate. In addition to affecting the steady-state binding of ligand to enzyme, as indicated by increases in K(M) values, significant decreases in k(cat) values suggested that replacement of either Arg187 and Arg188 with alanine perturbed the stabilization of both the transition state(s) and reaction intermediate. Thus, it appears that Arg187 and Arg188 are vital for proper orientation of the substrate in the active site, and furthermore this supports the proposed role of the stem peptide at binding subsite -2 in catalysis. Replacement of Gln100, a residue that would appear to interact with the N-acetyl group on MurNAc, did not show any changes in substrate affinity or activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".