MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046539031 · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.043203

Density-functional-theory study of 13-atom metal clusters<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ta</mml:mtext><mml:mo>–</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Pt</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2009· article· lv· W2046539031 on OpenAlexaff
Min Zhang, René Fournier

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2009
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGround stateCrystallographyAtom (system on chip)Energy (signal processing)Center (category theory)Atomic physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the structures of six proposed global minima (GMs) of ${M}_{13}$ clusters ($M=\text{Ta}$, W, Re, Os, Ir, and Pt) and 62 isomers that are within roughly 1 eV of the GM. The GM and isomers were obtained after several global optimization runs using a first-principles (Perdew-Burke-Enzerhof exchange-correlation) method to evaluate the energy. The GM and lowest-energy isomers can be described qualitatively as amorphous and compact for Ta, W, and Pt; quasicrystalline for Re; and cubic-prismatic for Os and Ir. The icosahedron is more than 1 eV above the GM in all cases, except 0.56 eV for ${\text{Ta}}_{13}$. The ground-state electronic configuration of the atoms is essential to understand structural trends in the clusters. Elements with a nearly closed-shell ground-state atom (W and Pt) produce many more low-energy cluster isomers than elements with partially filled $d$ shells, and those isomers are generally compact and amorphous. Partially filled $d$ shells in Os and Ir lead to strong directional bonding and many $90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$ angles between nearest neighbors. The predicted spin multiplicity of the GM is 2 $({\text{Ta}}_{13})$, 1 $({\text{W}}_{13})$, 6 $({\text{Re}}_{13})$, 5 $({\text{Os}}_{13})$, 4 $({\text{Ir}}_{13})$, and 3 $({\text{Pt}}_{13})$, and the spin multiplicity of all isomers within 0.5 eV of the GM is within $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2$ of these values and is smaller than 6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207