MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047025080 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.10.018

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Plerixafor in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

2009· article· en· W2047025080 on OpenAlexaffabout
Douglas A. Stewart, Clayton A. Smith, Ron MacFarland, Gary Calandra

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlerixaforMedicinePharmacodynamicsGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorCXCR4 antagonistMultiple myelomaPharmacokineticsLymphomaInternal medicineOncologyPharmacologyChemotherapyCXCR4

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies in healthy volunteers demonstrated that plerixafor (AMD3100), a CXCR4 antagonist, administered either alone or with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), resulted in dose-dependent mobilization of CD34(+) cells in the peripheral blood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and the PK and PD of plerixafor with G-CSF in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). This was a phase II, open-label, single-arm study conducted in 2 centers in Canada. Patients aged 18 to 70 years with NHL or MM eligible for autologous transplantation were eligible. A total of 22 patients (8 with NHL and 14 with MM) were enrolled in the study. The patients were given G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day subcutaneously [s.c.]) for 4 days in the morning and plerixafor 240 microg/kg s.c. on the evening before each day of apheresis. Apheresis was initiated 10 to 11 hours after each evening dose of plerixafor and after the morning dose of G-CSF. This regimen was repeated for up to 5 days or until > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected. The objectives were to determine the safety and efficacy of plerixafor in patients with NHL and MM, and the PK and PD of a single 240-microg/kg dose of plerixafor administered after 4 days of G-CSF mobilization in these patients. The median absolute peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count increased from 24.0 cells/microL before plerixafor administration to 75.0 cells/microL before the first apheresis (10 to 11 hours after treatment with plerixafor). The median number of CD34(+) cells collected in a median of 1 day was 5.7 x 10(6) cells/kg in the patients with NHL and 12.0 x 10(6) cells/kg in those with MM. All patients underwent transplantation with prompt and durable engraftment. The PK profile of plerixafor was characterized in 13 patients (5 with NHL and 8 with MM). Overall, the PK parameters were comparable in the patients with NHL and those with MM. Plerixafor was rapidly absorbed after s.c. administration with no observable lag time, with peak plasma concentrations occurring 0.5 hour after administration in most patients. Plerixafor was rapidly cleared, with a median terminal half-life of 4.6 hours. The median maximum increase in the number of circulating cells from baseline was 4.2-fold (range, 3.0- to 5.5-fold), with the maximum fold increase occurring approximately 10 hours after plerixafor injection for all patients. The plerixafor PK and PD profiles in the study patients were consistent with those in healthy volunteers and support the current dosing regimen and timing of apheresis. Plerixafor was safe and effective in mobilizing CD34(+) cells for transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207