MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047098332 · doi:10.1139/o2012-030

Gambogic acid promotes apoptosis and resistance to metastatic potential in MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma cells

2012· article· en· W2047098332 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chenglin Li, Qi Qi, Na Lu, Qinsheng Dai, Fanni Li, Xiaotang Wang, Qidong You, Qinglong Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOlympus
KeywordsGambogic acidApoptosisCancer researchIn vivoCytochrome cMetastasisCaspaseViability assayBiologyIn vitroProtein kinase BChemistryProgrammed cell deathCancerBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gambogic acid (GA) is considered a potent anti-tumor agent for its multiple effects on cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Low concentrations of GA (0.3-1.2 µmol/L) can suppress invasion of human breast carcinoma cells without affecting cell viability. To get a whole profile of the inhibition on breast cancers, higher concentrations of GA and spontaneous metastatic animal models were employed. Treatment with GA (3 and 6 µmol/L) induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Furthermore, GA induced PARP cleavage, activation of caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9, as well as an increased ratio of Bax/Bcl-2. Moreover, the translocation of apoptotic inducing factor (AIF) and the release of cytochrome c (Cyt c) from mitochondria were observed, indicating that GA induced apoptosis through accumulation of ROS and mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. GA also inhibited cell survival via blocking Akt/mTOR signaling. In vivo, GA significantly inhibited the xenograft tumor growth and lung metastases in athymic BALB/c nude mice bearing MDA-MB-231 cells. Collectively, these data provide further support for the multiple effects of GA on human breast cancer cells, as well as for its potential application to inhibit tumor growth and prevent metastasis in human cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicNatural Compound Pharmacology StudiesFrench-language works237,207