MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047979269 · doi:10.1021/jm990441x

Design and Solution Structure of Functional Peptide Mimetics of Nerve Growth Factor

2000· article· en· W2047979269 on OpenAlexaff
Natalia Beglova, Sergei Maliartchouk, Irena Ekiel, Maria Clara Zaccaro, H. Uri Saragovi, Kalle Gehring

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTropomyosin receptor kinase ANerve growth factorPeptideReceptorStereochemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The C-D loop in nerve growth factor (NGF) is involved in binding to the NGF receptor, TrkA. It is flexible and adopts several different types conformations in different NGF crystal forms. We have previously shown that a small cyclic peptide derived from the C-D loop of NGF binds to the TrkA receptor by mimicking the structure of this loop. To understand structure-function relationships in NGF C-D loop mimetics, we have produced a series of peptides predicted to form different types of beta-turns. The peptides were tested for their ability to promote cell survival in serum-free medium and to induce TrkA tyrosine phosphorylation. NMR structural studies were used to determined the backbone conformation and the spatial orientation of side chains involved in binding to the TrkA receptor. Peptides that form type I or type gammaL-alphaR beta-turns were the most active. The variety of active loop conformations suggests that the mimetics (and NGF) accommodate the binding site on TrkA by an 'induced fit' mechanism. In agreement with this hypothesis, NMR relaxation measurements detected both fast and slow motion in the peptides. We also characterized a retro-inverso peptide derived from the NGF C-D loop. This D-amino acid cyclic peptide did not adopt a conformation homologous to the NGF C-D loop and was inactive. This may be representative of difficulties in producing structural and functional mimetics by retro-inverso schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207