MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048178349 · doi:10.1086/499334

Low-Luminosity Active Galaxies and Their Central Black Holes

2006· article· en· W2048178349 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyi Dong, M. M. De Robertis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsBulgeBlack hole (networking)GalaxyStellar black holeAstronomySpin-flipSpiral galaxyLuminositySupermassive black holeIntermediate-mass black hole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central black hole masses for 118 spiral galaxies representing morphological stages S0/a through Sc and taken from the large spectroscopic survey of Ho et al. (1997) are derived using Ks-band data from 2MASS. Black hole masses are found using a calibrated black-hole – Ks bulge luminosity relation, while bulge luminosities are measured by means of a two-dimensional bulge/disk decomposition routine. The black hole masses are correlated against a variety of parameters representing properties of the nucleus and host galaxy. Nuclear properties such as line width (FWHM([N II])), as well as emission-line ratios (e.g., [O III]/Hβ, [O I]/Hα, [N II]/Hα, and [S II]/Hα), show a very high degree of correlation with blackhole mass. The excellent correlation with line-width supports the view that the emission-line gas is in virial equilibrium with either the black hole or bulge potential. The very good emission-line ratio correlations may indicate a change in ionizing continuum shape with black hole mass in the sense that more massive

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207