Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueHuman Genetics · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalOttawa Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity at BuffaloNIH Clinical CenterGroupement des Entreprises Françaises dans la lutte contre le CancerCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of PittsburghConseil Régional des Pays de la LoireWellcome TrustInstitute of GeneticsUniversity of CincinnatiAssociation Anne de Bretagne GenetiqueNational Institute on AgingHealth Science Center, University of TennesseeDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer InstituteUniversity of MinnesotaNational Cancer InstituteWake Forest UniversityGeorge Washington UniversityNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillBrigham and Women's HospitalKaiser PermanenteEmory UniversityBrown UniversityOhio State UniversityUniversity of Nevada, RenoNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesWomen's Health InitiativeNational Human Genome Research InstituteWayne State University
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyColorectal cancerSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyOdds ratioMeta-analysisGeneticsGenetic associationSNPOncologyCancerBioinformaticsInternal medicineMedicineGenotypeGene
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
