MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050554833 · doi:10.1038/nbt.1411

Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

2008· article· en· W2050554833 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Taylor, Dawn Field, Susanna‐Assunta Sansone, Jan Aerts, Rolf Apweiler, Michael Ashburner, Catherine A. Ball, Pierre‐Alain Binz, Molly A. Bogue, Tim Booth, Alvis Brāzma, Ryan R. Brinkman, Adam M. Clark, Eric W. Deutsch, Oliver Fiehn, Jennifer Fostel, Peter Ghazal, F. Gibson, Tanya Gray, Graeme R. Grimes, John M. Hancock, Nigel Hardy, Henning Hermjakob, Randall K. Julian, Matthew D. Kane, Carsten Kettner, Christopher R. Kinsinger, Eugene Kolker, Martin Kuiper, Nicolas Le Novère, Jim Leebens‐Mack, Suzanna Lewis, Phillip Lord, Ann‐Marie Mallon, Nishanth Marthandan, Hiroshi Masuya, Ruth McNally, Alexander Mehrle, Norman Morrison, Sandra Orchard, John Quackenbush, James M. Reecy, Donald G. Robertson, Philippe Rocca‐Serra, Henry Rodriguez, Heiko Rosenfelder, Javier Santoyo‐López, Richard H. Scheuermann, Daniel Schober, Barry Smith, Jason Snape, Christian J. Stoeckert, Keith F. Tipton, Peter Sterk, Andreas Untergasser, Jo Vandesompele, Stefan Wiemann

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Biotechnology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Human Genome Research InstituteBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsExtant taxonResource (disambiguation)Knowledge managementBusinessManagement scienceData scienceComputer scienceBiologyEngineeringEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations (MIBBI) project aims to foster the coordinated development of minimum-information checklists and provide a resource for those exploring the range of extant checklists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.615
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.666
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.6150.666
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0250.021
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0190.022
Open science0.0150.024
Research integrity0.0100.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations562
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature BiotechnologySame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207