THE MACROEVOLUTIONARY DIVERSIFICATION OF FEMALE AND MALE COMPONENTS OF THE STICKLEBACK BREEDING SYSTEM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Macroevolutionary analysis of three components in the stickleback breeding system, male/female nuptial colouration, male/female courtship and male lead/female follow to the nest revealed that: (i) a change in the male lead is always coupled with a change in the female follow, although there is no correlation between changes in particular components of the leadfollow system; (ii) a change in male courtship is coupled with a change in female courtship in all taxa but Gasterosteus and Hypoptychus. Once again, there is no correlation between changes in particular courtship components except for a possible coupling of 'male pummel' and 'female sink to the substrate'; and (iii) there is no correlation between the diversification of the male and female nuptial colour signals. These different patterns of macroevolutionary co-origination and co-diversification interact to produce unique and reliable species and sex-specific signals at the beginning of courtship + tightly coupled signals involved in coordination between spawning partners at the final stages of courtship. In order to explain the preceding macroevolutionary patterns, we now need to delineate the genetic basis for the traits in each behavioural system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it