Identifying a rapid bolus dose of dexmedetomidine (<scp>ED</scp>50) with acceptable hemodynamic outcomes in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly sensitive, specific α2 adrenoceptor agonist with anxiolytic, sedative, and analgesic effects. Administration is recommended as a loading dose infused over 10 min. Clinical experience and a previous study suggested a shorter time frame might be used without causing adverse hemodynamic effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the dexmedetomidine dose that can be given as a rapid 5 s bolus to healthy children during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) without causing significant hemodynamic effects. METHODS: ASA I-II children, aged 5-9 years, having elective surgery under TIVA were recruited. The up-and-down sequential study design was employed to determine the effective dose of dexmedetomidine, starting at 0.3 mcg·kg(-1) with 0.1 mcg·kg(-1) intervals, which caused no hemodynamic response in half the subjects (ED50). Positive responses were defined as mean blood pressure (MAP) and/or heart rate (HR) changes ≥30% from baseline. Three parametric estimators and one nonparametric estimator were used to determine the ED50. RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects with median age 7.1 (range 5.4-9.5) years and median weight 23.6 (range 16.2-36.7) kg were recruited. A maximum median HR decrease of 20 b·min(-1) occurred at 50 s and a maximum median MAP increase of 12.5 mmHg occurred at 100 s after bolus dose administration. Fifteen subjects (71%) had a HR <60 b·min(-1) while one subject had a HR <40 b·min(-1) (minimum 35 b·min(-1)) for 60 s following the dexmedetomidine bolus. Four estimators led to an ED50 estimate for dexmedetomidine of 0.49 mcg·kg(-1) [95% CI 0.26-0.80 mcg·kg(-1)]. CONCLUSION: The ED50 of dexmedetomidine administered over 5 s without significant hemodynamic compromise is 0.49 mcg·kg(-1). Further work is needed to determine the 'safe' (ED5 or less) and effective dose for desired perioperative clinical outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".