Cytotaxonomy of<i>Simulium siamense</i>Takaoka and Suzuki (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Thailand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Larval polytene chromosomes of 1824 individuals of Simulium siamense Takaoka and Suzuki from 32 locations in northern, northeastern, eastern, and central Thailand were examined. Differences in sex chromosomes, fixed inversions, and the kind and frequency of floating inversions revealed five cytoforms (A, B, C, D, and E). In contrast to most Simulium species, females of S. siamense are the heterogametic sex (ZW) and males are the homogametic sex (ZZ). Cytoform A differs from the others by having 23 floating inversions and undifferentiated sex chromosomes (W0 was undifferentiated from Z0). Cytoforms B, C, and D differ from each other by having different W chromosomes (W1, W2, and W3) in females. Cytoform E is characterized by having two fixed inversions, IS-1 and IIIS-2. Cytoform A is widely distributed throughout the geographic ranges of the species in northern, northeastern, eastern, and central Thailand, whereas cytoforms B, C, and D are restricted to a few locations in central Thailand. Although the larvae of the five cytoforms are morphologically similar, they seem to occupy different ecological habitats, which should be further investigated. At present, no definite conclusion can be drawn as to the taxonomic status of the cytoforms of S. siamense. However, this study indicates that S. siamense is represented by at least five cytoforms, of which cytoform B is the most distinct by having complete sex linkage and no floating inversions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".