Substrate Binding Affinity of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </i>Membrane-Bound Lytic Transglycosylase B by Hydrogen−Deuterium Exchange MALDI MS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lytic transglycosylases cleave the beta-(1-->4)-glycosidic bond in the bacterial cell wall heteropolymer, peptidoglycan, between the N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) residues with the concomitant formation of a 1,6-anhydromuramoyl residue. With 72% amino acid sequence identity between the enzymes, the theoretical structure of the membrane-bound lytic transglycosylase B (MltB) from Psuedomonas aeruginosa was modeled on the known crystal structure of Escherichia coli Slt35, the soluble derivative of its MltB. Of the twelve residues in Slt35 known to make contacts with peptidoglycan derivatives in Slt35, nine exist in the same position in the P. aeruginosa homologue, with two others only slightly displaced. To probe the binding properties of an engineered soluble form of the P. aeruginosa MltB, a SUPREX method involving hydrogen/deuterium exchange coupled with MALDI mass spectrometry detection was developed. Dissociation constants were calculated for a series of peptidoglycan components and compared to those obtained by difference UV absorption spectroscopy. These data indicated that GlcNAc alone does not bind to MltB with any measurable affinity but it does contribute to the binding of GlcNAc-MurNAc-dipeptide. With the MurNAc series of ligands, significant binding contributions are made through both the N-acetyl and C-3 lactyl moieties of the aminosugar with additional contributions to binding provided by associated peptides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".