MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054194083 · doi:10.1021/tx6002968

Near-UV Photolysis of 2-Methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone−DNA Duplexes:  Characterization of Reversible and Stable Interstrand Cross-Links between Quinone and Adenine Moieties

2007· article· en· W2054194083 on OpenAlexaff
François Bergeron, Klaus Klarskov, Darel J. Hunting, J. Richard Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Research in Toxicology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoietyChemistryDeprotonationPhotodissociationRadicalProtonationDNAStereochemistryAdductPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near-UV photolysis of 2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (MQ, menadione) tethered DNA induces initial charge transfer followed by either transport of the damage to G or the formation of interstrand cross-links between MQ and DNA bases. In this work, the products responsible for interstrand cross-links have been characterized by mass spectrometry, NMR, and comparison with model compounds. Three major products were formed in the photolysis of MQ-DNA duplexes. Two of the products (isomers) have a cross-link between C2 of a 2,3-saturated MQ moiety and N6 of a dAdo moiety. These products readily convert back to MQ and dAdo upon heating in neutral solution, and thus, they lead to reversible cross-links in MQ-DNA duplexes. The third product has a cross-link between C3 of a 2,3-unsaturated MQ moiety and N6 of an dAdo moiety. This product was stable in neutral solution. The formation of MQ to A cross-links in DNA may be explained by the coupling of MQ radicals that arise from the protonation of MQ radical anions, together with adenin-N6-yl radicals that arise from the deprotonation of A radical cations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Research in ToxicologySame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207