MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2054783485 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-2105

Abstract 2105: Regulation of estrogen receptor turnover by lysine 302 methylation

2014· article· en· W2054783485 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth L. Zoeller, Dalia Baršytė-Lovejoy, Peter J. Brown, Dafydd R. Owen, C.H. Arrowsmith, Paula M. Vertino

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreStructural Genomics ConsortiumUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTamoxifenEstrogen receptorMethylationDownregulation and upregulationEstrogenEstrogen receptor alphaMG132Cancer researchChemistrySUMO proteinEstrogen receptor betaInternal medicineEndocrinologyCancerBreast cancerBiologyUbiquitinMedicineProteasome inhibitorProteasomeBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The estrogen pathway promotes growth of breast cancer, the leading cancer diagnosis among US women. The antiestrogen therapy Tamoxifen has been the mainline therapy for the 70% of women whose tumors are estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) positive for over thirty years. Understanding how ERα is regulated, particularly in the context of Tamoxifen, is essential for the treatment of breast cancer. In previous work, we showed that SetD7 mediated methylation of ERα at lysine 302 (K302) is a key mediator of estrogen receptor alpha stability. Downregulation of SetD7 or mutation of K302 increased the rate of ERα turnover resulting in a compromised estrogen driven transcriptional response. However, the precise mechanism by which lysine 302 methylation regulates ERα stability and transcriptional activity is not yet known. In this study, we used a novel small molecule inhibitor of SetD7, (R)-PFI-2, as a chemical probe to further investigate the role of K302 methylation in the regulation of ERα. Treatment of ERα expressing MCF7 breast cancer cells with (R)-PFI-2 resulted in a dose-dependent shift in the 66kDa ERα species to a slower migrating form as detected by protein electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Molecular mass estimates of this slower migrating form are consistent with a sumoylation event. Interestingly, (R)-PFI-2-induced accumulation of the slower migrating form was only observed upon inhibition of the proteasome with MG132, suggesting that this alternately modified form of ERα represents an intermediate in the pathway to degradation. A similar time-dependent shift to the same slower migrating form was observed upon estrogen depletion of MCF7 cells stably knocked down for SetD7, but not in control cells. Furthermore, an inverse relationship was observed between endogenous levels of SetD7 and the levels of modified ER in two strains of MCF7 cell line that differ in their sensitivity to Tamoxifen. These data suggest that methylation of ERα at K302 by SetD7 may stabilize ERα by blocking another post-translational modification, possibly sumoylation, necessary for its turnover. The relationship between ER methylation, sumoylation and Tamoxifen sensitivity will be discussed. Citation Format: Elizabeth L. Zoeller, Dalia Barsyte-Lovejoy, Peter J. Brown, Dafydd R. Owen, Cheryl H. Arrowsmith, Paula M. Vertino. Regulation of estrogen receptor turnover by lysine 302 methylation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2105. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2105

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEstrogen and related hormone effects→French-language works237,207→