MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057490482 · doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00349

The Effect of Dietary Sinapic Acid (4-Hydroxy-3, 5-Dimethoxy-Cinnamic Acid) on Gastrointestinal Tract Microbial Fermentation, Nutrient Utilization, and Egg Quality in Laying Hens

2008· article· en· W2057490482 on OpenAlexafffund
Michelle Johnson, J.P. Dahiya, A. A. Olkowski, Hank Classen

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsFood scienceYolkAmenNutrientHaugh unitBiologyGizzardFermentationCecumMealBroilerChemistryGastrointestinal tractAnimal scienceFeed conversion ratioBody weightBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant-based simple phenolics are natural antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds that may possess biological activity when included in animal diets. Previous work in our lab has shown that sinapic acid (SA) found in canola meal improves nutrient retention and alters gut microbiota when fed at low levels (0 to 0.10%) to broiler chickens. It was of interest to investigate the effect of dietary SA in laying hens that possess a more mature intestinal microbiota. Therefore, 2 experiments were conducted to determine the effects of dietary SA on performance, nutrient digestibility, and egg quality in laying hens. Sinapic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, 98% purity) was included in diets at 0, 0.025, 0.050, and 0.075% in experiment 1, and 0 and 0.5% in experiment 2. Both experiments were conducted for 21 d. Dietary treatment did not affect production traits and gastrointestinal tract volatile fatty acid production in either experiment. Apparent metabolizable energy and protein digestibility were also unaffected by treatment in experiment 1, but in experiment 2, feeding 0.5% SA increased both AME(n) and protein digestibility in comparison to the unsupplemented control. Egg weight, albumen weight, yolk weight, egg specific gravity, shell thickness, and Haugh units were not significantly affected by dietary treatments in either of the experiments. Sinapic acid was not detected in eggs from experiment 1 but in experiment 2, low levels of SA were detected in both the yolk and albumen of eggs from hens fed 0.5% SA. Further research is needed to more completely define the relationship between dietary SA level and nutrient utilization as well as the accumulation of SA in egg components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207