Cardiovascular α<sub>1</sub>-adrenoceptor subtypes: functions and signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
alpha-Adrenoceptors (alpha1AR) are G protein-coupled receptors and include alpha1A, alpha1B, and alpha1D subtypes corresponding to cloned alpha1a, alpha1b, and alpha1d, respectively. alpha1AR mediate several cardiovascular actions of sympathomimetic amines such as vasoconstriction and cardiac inotropy, hypertrophy, metabolism, and remodeling. alpha1AR subtypes are products of separate genes and differ in structure, G protein-coupling, tissue distribution, signaling, regulation, and functions. Both alpha(1A)AR and alpha(1B)AR mediate positive inotropic responses. On the other hand, cardiac hypertrophy is primarily mediated by alpha(1A)AR. The only demonstrated major function of alpha(1D)AR is vasoconstriction. alpha1AR are coupled to phospholipase C, phospholipase D, and phospholipase A2; they increase intracellular Ca2+ and myofibrillar sensitivity to Ca2+ and cause translocation of specific phosphokinase C isoforms to the particulate fraction. Cardiac hypertrophic responses to alpha1AR agonists might involve activation of phosphokinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase via Gq x alpha1AR subtypes might interact with each other and with other receptors and signaling mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".