MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058295402 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m513629200

Regulation of FOXC1 Stability and Transcriptional Activity by an Epidermal Growth Factor-activated Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Cascade

2006· article· en· W2058295402 on OpenAlexaff
Fred B. Berry, Farideh Mirzayans, Michael A. Walter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFOXO transcription factor regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransactivationTranscription factorCell biologyProtein kinase AUbiquitinBiologyPhosphorylationEpidermal growth factorBiochemistryGeneReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations in the FOXC1 transcription factor gene result in Axenfeld Rieger malformations, a disorder that affects the anterior segment of the eye, the teeth, and craniofacial structures. Individuals with this disorder possess an elevated risk for developing glaucoma. Previous work in our laboratory has indicated that FOXC1 transcriptional activity may be regulated by phosphorylation. We report here that FOXC1 is a short-lived protein (t 1/2< 30 min), and serine 272 is a critical residue in maintaining proper stability of FOXC1. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that activation of the ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase through epidermal growth factor stimulation is required for maximal FOXC1 transcriptional activation and stability. Finally, we have demonstrated that FOXC1 is targeted to the ubiquitin 26 S proteasomal degradation pathway and that amino acid residues 367-553, which include the C-terminal transactivation domain of FOXC1, are essential for ubiquitin incorporation and proteolysis. These results indicate that FOXC1 protein levels and activity are tightly regulated by post-translational modifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicFOXO transcription factor regulationFrench-language works237,207