Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of an Internet retailer’s managerial goals is to create positive perceptions of retail prices among online customers. This study examines the relationship between customer perception of Internet retailers’ service quality and customer price perception. Unlike previous studies, this study extends the scope of service quality to three stages of service interaction: first, a retailer’s home page presentation; second, the overall retail website, which we call a retailer’s order-procurement quality; and third, the retailer’s order-fulfillment quality. To that end, this study samples 516 Internet retailers whose service quality information in their separate service interaction stages is available on their home pages and on a well-known rating site, Bizrate.com. The results verify a clear connection between service quality perception and price perception along the chronological flow of service interaction. In particular, both the presentation of an effective home page web format and the customer perception of a retailer’s order-procurement quality are significantly associated with customer price perception. The price perception is also significantly associated with order-fulfillment quality perception. These findings suggest that the configuration of customer perceptions of both service quality and price stands out as an important subject for managerial attention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".