Evidence of diploidy in the wild Amerindian yam, a putative progenitor of the endangered species<i>Dioscorea trifida</i>(Dioscoreaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fundamental question about Dioscorea trifida (Dioscoreaceae), the most important Amerindian yam, that remains unresolved concerns its evolutionary origin, since no wild relative has been reported. In this paper we report the existence of D. trifida's wild relative for the first time. The diploidy of wild D. trifida (2n = 40) is clearly demonstrated by flow cytometry, chromosome counts, and microsatellite pattern analysis, whereas the cultivated form was previously shown to be autotetraploid (2n = 80). In the coastal region where the wild and cultivated forms are sympatric, tetraploid and triploid cytotypes coexist within the same populations. In the sites where the wild and cultivated forms are allopatric, the wild diploid cytotype predominates. AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) analyses gave an initial idea of the position of the wild forms in relation to the cultivated forms. All the wild and cultivated types form a monophyletic group structured into two major subgroups corresponding to the tetraploid cytotype of the cultivated form and the diploid cytotype of the wild form. The triploid cytotypes of the wild form are in an intermediary position. Wild accessions are grouped on the basis of their geographic origin. The data presented in this paper are significant for the effective breeding and conservation of D. trifida and to assess its genetic diversity and population structure for the general understanding of the evolution and domestication of the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".