MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060550258 · doi:10.1002/app.24216

Photoregulated complexation, redox behavior, and photoluminescence of a supramolecular polymer solution

2006· article· en· W2060550258 on OpenAlexaff
Smail Dahmane, Yue Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoisomerizationRedoxPhotochemistrySupramolecular chemistryMoietyTetraphenylporphyrinPhotoluminescencePolymerSupramolecular polymersPolymer chemistryElectrochemistryChemistryCyclic voltammetryMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryInorganic chemistryElectrodeMoleculeOrganic chemistryPorphyrinCatalysisIsomerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reported in this paper is a new finding based on a spectroscopic and electrochemical study of a supramolecular polymer in dilute solution. Dissolved in a mixture of dichloromethane and acetonitrile, zinc‐tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP) can complex with a polymethacrylate bearing an azopyridine moiety (AzPy) through the axial coordination between the metal and pyridyl group. The self‐assembled polymer (PAzPy–ZnTPP) displays different photoluminescence and redox behaviors compared with those of noncomplexed ZnTPP. Moreover, the reversible trans–cis‐photoisomerization of azopyridine upon UV and visible light irradiation was found to alter the equilibrium of the axial coordination between azopyridine and ZnTPP in solution, resulting in photoregulable redox potentials and fluorescence emission of the metalloporphyrin. The results suggest that supramolecular polymer solutions could enhance the mechanism of photoinduced change in the degree of complexation, which gives rise to a phenomenon of photoregulation of the electrochemical and optical properties. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 744–750, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicMolecular Sensors and Ion DetectionFrench-language works237,207