MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062002051 · doi:10.1139/g08-006

Genetic and epigenetic changes of rDNA in a synthetic allotetraploid, <i>Aegilops sharonensis</i> × <i>Ae. umbellulata</i>

2008· article· en· W2062002051 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. B. Shcherban, Е. Д. Бадаева, Аlexandra V. Amosova, И. Г. Адонина, Е. А. Салина

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Academy of SciencesRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsBiologyAegilopsGeneticsLocus (genetics)GenomePloidyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthetic allotetraploid Aegilops sharonensis x Ae. umbellulata (genomic formula S(sh)U) was used to study inheritance and expression of 45S rDNA during early stages of allopolyploid formation. Using silver staining, we revealed suppression of the NORs (nucleolar organizing regions) from the S(sh) genome in response to polyploidization. Most allopolyploid plants of the S(2)-S(4) generations retained the chromosomal location of 45S rDNA typical for the parental species, except for two S(3) plants in which a deletion of the rDNA locus on one of the homologous 6S(sh) chromosomes was revealed. In addition, we found a decrease in NOR signal intensity on both 6S(sh) chromosomes in a portion of the S(3) and S(4) allopolyploid plants. As Southern hybridization showed, the allopolyploid plants demonstrated additive inheritance of parental rDNA units together with contraction of copy number of some rDNA families inherited from Ae. sharonensis. Also, we identified a new variant of amplified rDNA unit with MspAI1 restriction sites characteristic of Ae. umbellulata. These genetic alterations in the allopolyploid were associated with comparative hypomethylation of the promoter region within the Ae. umbellulata-derived rDNA units. The fast uniparental elimination of rDNA observed in the synthetic allopolyploid agrees well with patterns observed previously in natural wheat allotetraploids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207