A Multiple Case Study of Community-Based Water Management Initiatives in New Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable development is based on a search for strategies compatible with social values, economic feasibility and ecosystem integrity.In the domain of water, integrated resource management is widely recognized as a strategy to sustainability as reflected in the Canadian Water Resources Association's Sustainability Principles.Central to furthering this recognition as well as the acceptance and implementation of integration in water management is the examination of contemporary institutional experience.This paper uses a multiple case study methodology to examine the contribution the community-based organizations make to integrated water management in the province of New Brunswick.A comprehensive framework of integration indices with a broad spectrum of management elements provides guidance for the examination and analysis of five provincial cases.We conclude that the frve organizations have adapted critical elements of integration to varying degrees and that their experience generally confirms observations and theories regarding the implementation of integrated resource management. RE5UMELe ddveloppement durable est bas6 sur une recherche de strat6gies compatibles avec les valeurs sociales, les possibilit6s 6conomiques et l'environnement naturel.Dans le domaine de l'eau, comme en tdmoigne Sustainability Principles pubhd par lAssociation canadienne des ressources de l'eau, f int6gration de la gestion des ressources est g6n6ralement reconnue comme une strat6gie en vue d'un ddveloppement durable.Lexamen des exp6riences institutionnelles contemporaines
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".