The synaptic behaviour of the wild forms of<i>Triticum turgidum</i>and<i>T. timopheevii</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different wild allopolyploid species of Triticeae show extensive bivalent formation at zygotene while a considerable number of multivalents is present in cultivated polyploid wheats. To study the chromosome behaviour at early meiotic stages in wild forms of tetraploid wheats Triticum turgidum and T timopheevii (2n = 4x = 28) we have analysed the synaptic pattern in fully traced spread nuclei at mid- and late zygotene and at pachytene of wild accessions of these species. The mean number of synaptonemal complex (SC) bivalents at mid-zygotene ranged from 12.22 to 13.14 among the accessions studied indicating a strong restriction of synapsis initiation to homologous chromosomes. The mean of bivalents increased at pachytene because of the transformation of multivalents into bivalents. Ring bivalents observed at metaphase I support that SC bivalents were formed by homologous chromosomes. The average values of SC bivalents at mid-zygotene in the wild forms are much higher than the average values observed in the cultivated tetraploid wheats but similar to that of a mutant line of T turgidum with a duplication that includes Ph1, the major homoeologous pairing suppressor locus. These results suggest that the efficiency of the mechanism operating in the homologous recognition for synapsis is higher in wild wheat populations than in cultivated varieties. Apparently, a relatively detrimental modification of the pairing regulating genetic system accompanied the domestication of the wild wheat forms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".