Characterization of hardened cylindrical C1018 steel rods (0.14%–0.2% C, 0.6%–0.9% Mn) using photothermal radiometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequency-domain photothermal radiometry has been used for the evaluation of the hardened case depth and the measurement of the thermophysical properties (thermal conductivity and diffusivity) of cylindrical C1018 heat-treated steel rods. The measurement results of several steel cylinders nominally hardened identically during a common heat-treating process were consistent with each other and also with mechanical indentation hardness test results. The application of the two-layer composite cylinder thermal-wave theory yielded an effective case depth within the discrete two-layer thermal-wave approximation. This technique provides a relatively simple noncontact and nondestructive method for evaluating the thermophysical parameters of layered cylindrical samples. The good fit of the experimental frequency scans to the two-layer thermal-wave model was shown to constitute a reasonable method for calibrating actual continuously decreasing hardness depth profiles by means of abrupt two-layer-equivalent profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".