MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064613874 · doi:10.1139/v01-200

2001 Lemieux Award Lecture Organic chemistry and hemoglobin: Benefits from controlled alteration

2002· article· en· W2064613874 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Ronald Kluger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryHemoglobinCooperativityNitric oxideOxygenMethemoglobinBlood substituteRed blood cellHemeBiophysicsBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemoglobin carries oxygen in circulation within red cells but does not function outside the cells because it fails not only to release oxygen but also dissociates into dimers that make up the tetrameric protein. Bifunctional anionic acylating agents that contain a structurally rigid bridge introduce cross-links that stabilize hemoglobin and alter its oxygen affinity so that it could be used to carry oxygen outside cells. Nitric oxide binds to hemoglobin and in circulation this causes undesirable increases in blood pressure. It had been reported that higher weight collections of hemoglobin do not cause vasoconstriction. Reagents with two pairs of reaction sites joined by a rigid link connect and cross-link two hemoglobins. The resulting bis-tetramers lack the cooperativity of the native protein and bind oxygen too tightly to be useful; occupation by oxygen blocks the sites from nitric oxide. Nitric oxide may be delivered from thionitrosyl groups, which occur in hemoglobin in the red cell. Cross-linked hemoglobin can be specifically nitrosylated. These species can then serve as circulating sources of nitric oxide resulting from an internal electron transfer.Key words: proteins, hemoglobin, cross-link, red cells, cooperativity, connecting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1430.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicHemoglobin structure and functionFrench-language works237,207