MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064632436 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20615

High pressure physical solubility of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) in mixed polyethylene glycol dimethyl ethers (Genosorb 1753)

2011· article· en· W2064632436 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Aravind V. Rayer, Amr Henni, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaClariant
KeywordsEnthalpySolubilityChemistryGibbs free energyThermodynamicsNon-random two-liquid modelPolyethylene glycolEnthalpy change of solutionCarbon dioxidePhysical chemistryActivity coefficientOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solubility of carbon dioxide in a mixture of polyethylene glycol dimethyl ethers (Genosorb 1753) was determined at 298.15, 313.15, 323.15 and 333.15 K at pressures up to 7940 kPa. The obtained solubility data are compared with those of CO2 in other physical solvents. The results were correlated with the Peng–Robinson (Peng and Robinson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59–64 1976) equation of state, and the interaction parameters are reported. Data at 323.15 K were predicted. Henry's Law constants were obtained from the data and the excess properties (excess Gibbs free energy, excess entropy and excess enthalpy) of the liquid mixture over the full range of composition were predicted at each temperature using the NRTL activity coefficient model. Enthalpy of solution and the enthalpy of mixing were determined at infinite dilution. In addition, the heats of absorption were determined using Clausius–Clapeyron equation. La solubilité du dioxyde de carbone (CO2) dans un mélange de polyéthylène glycol diméthyl éthers (Genosorb 1753) a été déterminée à 298.15, 313.15, 323.15 et 333.15 K à des pressions allant jusqu'à 7940 kPa. Les données de solubilité obtenues sont comparées avec celles de CO2 dans d'autres solvants physiques. Les résultats ont été corrélés avec l'équation d'état de Peng–Robinson (Peng and Robinson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59–64 1976) et les paramètres d'interaction sont présentés. La solubilité à 323.15 K a été prédite. Les constantes de la loi d'Henry ont été obtenues à partir des données. Les propriétés en excès (l'énergie libre de Gibbs d'excès, l'entropie et l'enthalpie d'excès) du mélange liquide sur toute la gamme de composition a ont été prédites à chaque température en utilisant le modèle NRTL. L'enthalpie de solution et l'enthalpie de mélange ont été déterminées dilution infinie. Finalement, les chaleurs d'absorption ont été déterminées en utilisant l'équation de Clausius–Clapeyron. © 2011 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2011
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207