Wallach rearrangement of azoxypyridines and azoxypyridine <i>N</i>-oxides — Charge distributions and dramatic reactivity differences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extension of our studies of the generic Wallach rearrangement (of azoxybenzene to 4-hydroxyazobenzene) to the heteroaromatic series (azoxypyridines and axoxypyridine N-oxides) has revealed some dramatic reactivity differences, particularly for the α and β compounds. We have studied the 3-isomers and the 4-isomers in each series, each with α and β forms, eight compounds in all, in the 100 wt% sulfuric acid region of acidity. In those cases in which a product could be observed, the α and β isomers both give the same one, the corresponding 4′-hydroxyazo compounds. All the compounds react much more slowly than does azoxybenzene itself, presumably because of the extra positive charge present in the substrates, but the β isomers have half-lives of seconds and the α isomers half-lives of hundreds of hours in the 100 wt% H 2 SO 4 acidity region. The α compounds have measurable pK BH + values, but the β compounds do not, exhibiting only a medium effect in the acidity region in which the α compounds protonate. This means that for the β compounds, the protonated intermediates must be much less stable and the postulated reaction intermediates must be much more stable than for the α compounds. To clarify this, we have obtained Mulliken charge distributions for the various species concerned, calculating the charge carried by each half of the molecule, larger charge separations being taken to indicate lesser stability. As far as we can establish, this is the first time that this technique has been used to indicate the stabilities of carbocationic species.Key words: azoxypyridines, azoxypyridine N-oxides, Wallach rearrangement, excess acidity, basicities, theoretical calculations, charge distributions, reactivities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".