Requirements for Osmosensing and Osmotic Activation of Transporter ProP from<i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transporter ProP of Escherichia coli, a solute-H+ symporter, can sense and respond to osmotic upshifts imposed on cells, on membrane vesicles, or on proteoliposomes that incorporate purified ProP-(His)6. In this study, proline uptake catalyzed by ProP was used as a measure of its osmotic activation, and the requirements for osmosensing were defined using the proteoliposome system. The initial rate of proline uptake increased with decreasing external pH and increasing DeltaPsi, lumen negative. Osmotic upshifts increased DeltaPsi by concentrating lumenal K+, but osmotic activation of ProP could be distinguished from this effect. Osmotic activation of ProP resulted from changes in Vmax, though osmotic shifts also increased the KM for proline. Osmotic activation could be described as a reversible, osmotic upshift-dependent transition linking (at least) two transporter protein conformations. No correlation was observed between ProP activation and the position of the anions of activating sodium salts within the Hofmeister series of solutes. Both the magnitude of the osmotic upshift required to activate ProP and the ProP activity attained were similar for membrane-impermeant osmolytes, including NaCl, glucose, and PEG 600. The membrane-permeant osmolytes glycerol, urea, PEG 62, and PEG 106 failed to activate ProP. Two poly(ethylene glycol)s, PEG 150 and PEG 200, were membrane-permeant and did not cause liposome shrinkage, but they did partially activate ProP-(His)6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".