Roles of aggrecan domains in biosynthesis, modification by glycosaminoglycans and product secretion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aggrecan is a member of the chondroitin sulphate (CS) proteoglycan family, which also includes versican/PG-M, neurocan and brevican. Members of this family exhibit structural similarity: a G1 domain at the N-terminus and a G3 domain at the C-terminus, with a central sequence for modification by CS chains. A unique feature of aggrecan is the insertion of three additional domains, an inter-globular domain (IGD), a G2 domain and a keratan sulphate (KS) domain (sequence modified by KS chains), between the G1 domain and the CS domain (sequence modified by CS chains). The G1 and G3 domains have been implicated in product secretion, but G2, although structurally similar to the tandem repeats of G1, performs an unknown function. To define the functions of each aggrecan domain in product processing, we cloned and expressed these domains in various combinations in COS-7 cells. The results indicated that the G3 domain enhanced product secretion, alone or in combination with the KS or CS domain, and promoted glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chain attachment. Constructs containing the G1 domain were not secreted. Addition of a CS domain sequence to G1 reduced this inhibition, but GAG chain attachment was still decreased. The potential GAG chain attachment site in the IGD was occupied by GAGs, and IGD product was secreted efficiently. The KS domain was modified by GAG chains and secreted. Finally, the G2 domain was expressed but not secreted, and inhibited secretion of the IGD when expressed as an IGD-G2 combination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".