Autoprocessing of the Escherichia coli AIDA-I Autotransporter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cleavage of the autotransporter adhesin involved in diffuse adherence (AIDA-I) of Escherichia coli yields a membrane-embedded fragment, AIDAc, and an extracellular fragment, the mature AIDA-I adhesin. The latter remains noncovalently associated with AIDAc but can be released by heat treatment. In this study we determined the mechanism of AIDA-I cleavage. We showed that AIDA-I processing is an autocatalytic event by monitoring the in vitro cleavage of an uncleaved mutant protein isolated from inclusion bodies. Furthermore, by following changes in circular dichroism spectra and protease resistance of the renaturated protein, we showed that the cleavage of the protein is correlated with folding. With site-directed deletions, we showed that the catalytic activity of the protein lies in a region encompassing amino acids between Ala-667 and Thr-953, which includes the conserved junction domain of some autotransporters. With site-directed point mutations, we also found that Asp-878 and Glu-897 are involved in the processing of AIDA-I and that a mutation preserving the acidic side chain of Asp-878 was tolerated, giving evidence that this carboxylic acid group is directly involved in catalysis. Last, we confirmed that cleavage of AIDA-I is intramolecular. Our results unveil a new mechanism of auto-processing in the autotransporter family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".