MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066660358 · doi:10.2320/matertrans.md201228

Grain Refinement during Rapid Solidification of Aluminum–Zirconium Alloys Using Electrospark Deposition

2013· article· en· W2066660358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMATERIALS TRANSACTIONS · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Treatment and Coatings
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMaterials scienceEquiaxed crystalsTetragonal crystal systemZirconiumSupercoolingAlloyMetallurgyDeposition (geology)AluminiumIngotSupersaturationCrystal structureThermodynamicsCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrospark deposition (ESD) was applied to Al–Zr binary system in order to study the possible change of solidification structure from the stable D023 tetragonal equilibrium phases to the cubic L12, when high cooling rates and undercooling conditions are involved. The results show that a supersaturated solid solution was formed for the alloy containing 0.5 at%Zr, while a two-region layered structure was developed for the alloys with 1–1.5 at%Zr. These layers are composed of refined equiaxed grains, with a smaller particle size distribution for the region where the L12 precipitates were present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it