MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066955380 · doi:10.1021/ma801826p

Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy Study of the Photolytic Process in Poly(phenyl thioether) with Pendant Iron Moieties

2008· article· en· W2066955380 on OpenAlexaff
Edwige Otero, Patrick O. Shipman, Alaa S. Abd‐El‐Aziz, Stephen G. Urquhart

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThioetherPolymerPolymer chemistryXANESChemistryCounterionAbsorption spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Oxidation statePhotochemistryMaterials scienceSpectroscopyMetalOrganic chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectra of poly(phenyl thioether) polymers with pendant Fe(Cp) iron moieties have been recorded at the carbon 1s, iron 2p, and phosphorus 1s and 2p edges. This study shows that solution photofragmentation of the organometallic polymer causes the removal of iron moieties and the preparation of the corresponding organic polymer: poly(phenyl thioether). Spectroscopic characterization of poly(phenyl thioether) prepared in this manner indicates the presence of iron oxide, likely Fe 2 O 3, and hexafluorophosphate counterion trapped in the demetalated polymer matrix. A photolytic examination of the solid phase poly(phenyl thioether)−Fe(Cp) organometallic polymer shows that irradiation of this polymer in air leads to the formation of poly(phenyl thioether) and Fe 2 O 3, while irradiation in vacuum leads to formation of iron species with a lower oxidation state. The ability to probe the oxidation state of this metal species is relevant to understanding how demetalation conditions affect the properties of the polymer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207