MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067573318 · doi:10.1021/jo001252l

Synthesis of Enantiopure 7-[3-Azidopropyl]indolizidin-2-one Amino Acid. A Constrained Mimic of the Peptide Backbone Geometry and Heteroatomic Side-Chain Functionality of the Ala-Lys Dipeptide

2001· article· en· W2067573318 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Feng, William D. Lubell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryEnantiopure drugDipeptideRegioselectivitySilyl etherReductive aminationDiastereomerSodium hydrideEtherStereoselectivityAlkylationStereochemistrySide chainHydrolysisAzideOlefin fiberKetoneAmino acidMitsunobu reactionSilylationOrganic chemistryEnantioselective synthesisCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enantiopure N-(BOC)amino-7-[3-azidopropyl]indolizidin-2-one acid 1 has been synthesized by displacement of the methanesulfonate of its 7-hydroxypropyl counterpart 11 with sodium azide and subsequent ester hydrolysis. N-(BOC)Amino-7-[3-hydroxypropyl]indolizidin-2-one ester 11 was obtained from a sequence commencing with the alkylation of (2S,8S)-di-tert-butyl 5-oxo-2,8-di-[N-(PhF)amino]azelate 5 (PhF = 9-(9-phenylfluorenyl)). Stereoselective allylation of 5, regioselective olefin hydroboration, selective primary alcohol protection as a silyl ether, and oxidation of the secondary alcohol gave (2S,4R,8S)-di-tert-butyl 4-[3-tert-butyldimethylsiloxypropyl]-5-oxo-2,8-di-[N-(PhF)amino]azelate 9 as a pure diastereomer in 33% overall yield. Linear ketone 9 was then converted into the indolizidinone heterocycle by a route featuring reductive amination, lactam cyclization, and isolation by way of a silyl ether which provided the (6S,7R)-isomer of 11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207