A re-evaluation of the role of histidine-426 within Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CRM66 (cross-reactive 66 kDa protein) is an inactive mutant form of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A that has been isolated from a mutant strain of P. aeruginosa derived from nitrosoguanidine-based mutagenesis. The mutation within this enzyme toxin was previously identified as H426Y and it was shown to possess significantly reduced enzymic activity. Furthermore, it was previously suggested that His-426 may directly participate in the catalytic mechanism of the exotoxin A enzyme and that it may also play an important role in the binding of the protein substrate of exotoxin A, a critical protein factor in eukaryotic protein translation known as elongation factor-2. In order to more thoroughly characterize the role of His-426 in the enzyme mechanism of exotoxin A, amino acid substitutions were made within helix 1 of the enzyme domain in the vicinity of the His-426 residue. Analysis of the site-directed mutagenesis results involving kinetic and protein structural integrity measurements revealed that His-426 H-bonds to Tyr-502 and that replacement of His-426 with polar substitutions leads to structural alterations of the enzyme's folded conformation. Furthermore, it was shown that His-426 is not important for the binding of either of the two substrates of exotoxin A, NAD(+) or elongation factor-2. In summary, these data show that His-426 is not an active-site residue and that it is not important for substrate binding or orientation, but that it plays an important structural role in helping to maintain the folded conformation of the enzyme toxin. Therefore, the role of His-426 would seem to be to tether helix 1 to the main body of the enzyme, and mutations resulting in the disruption of this region of the enzyme result in a significantly impaired enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".