The genome of<i>Oscheius tipulae</i>: determination of size, complexity, and structure by DNA reassociation using fluorescent dye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work describes the physicochemical characterization of the genome and telomere structure from the nematode Oscheius tipulae CEW1. Oscheius tipulae is a free-living nematode belonging to the family Rhabditidae and has been used as a model system for comparative genetic studies. A new protocol that combines fluorescent detection of double-stranded DNA and S1 nuclease was used to determine the genome size of O. tipulae as 100.8 Mb (approximately 0.1 pg DNA/haploid nucleus). The genome of this nematode is made up of 83.4% unique copy sequences, 9.4% intermediate repetitive sequences, and 7.2% highly repetitive sequences, suggesting that its structure is similar to those of other nematodes of the genus Caenorhabditis. We also showed that O. tipulae has the same telomere repeats already found in Caenorhabditis elegans at the ends and in internal regions of the chromosomes. Using a cassette-ligation-mediated PCR protocol we were able to obtain 5 different putative subtelomeric sequences of O. tipulae, which show no similarity to C. elegans or C. briggsae subtelomeric regions. DAPI staining of hermaphrodite gonad cells show that, as detected in C. elegans and other rhabditids, O. tipulae have a haploid complement of 6 chromosomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".