MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069271524 · doi:10.1038/icb.2010.80

Lowering TCR expression on naive CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells does not affect memory T‐cell differentiation

2010· article· en· W2069271524 on OpenAlexafffund
Julie Leignadier, Julie Rooney, Jean‐François Daudelin, Nathalie Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology and Cell Biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellT-cell receptorCD8Cell biologyBiologyInterleukin 21T cellIL-2 receptorEffectorNaive T cellImmunologyAntigenImmune systemIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generation of long-lived memory T (Tm) cells is critical for the success of vaccination, but the factors controlling their differentiation are still poorly defined. We examined the hypothesis that the level of T-cell receptor (TCR) engagement contributed to memory CD8(+) T-cell generation. By manipulating TCR expression levels on murine, naive ovalbumin (OVA)-specific CD8(+) T cells, we showed that the expansion of antigen (Ag)-specific CD8(+) T cells is minimally affected by the level of TCR expression. Indeed, naive CD8(+) T cells expressing as little as a 1000 TCRs (30-fold less) show only a 2.5-fold reduction in the number of effectors generated. Furthermore, the TCR expression levels influenced neither the acquisition of effector functions nor the generation of functional Tm cells. Our data indicate that during an in vivo immune response, a threshold in the number of TCRs engaged by naive CD8(+) T cells is required for full T-cell expansion but not for their differentiation into effector and Tm cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunology and Cell BiologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207