MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Essential role of toxin A in <i>C. difficile</i> 027 and reference strain supernatant-mediated disruption of Caco-2 intestinal epithelial barrier function

2008· article· en· W2069894530 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Sutton, S Li, John N. Webb, Katie Solomon, John Brazier, Yashwant R. Mahida

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Immunology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClostridium difficile toxin AToxinClostridium difficile toxin BCaco-2SepharoseMicrobiologyMonoclonal antibodyBarrier functionEpitheliumClostridium difficileAntibodyBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyImmunologyIn vitroBiochemistryCell biologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clostridium difficile induces mucosal inflammation via secreted toxins A and B and initial interactions between the toxins and intestinal epithelial cells (which lead to loss of barrier function) are believed to be important in disease pathogenesis. Secreted toxin-specific antibodies may inhibit such interactions. Using the Caco-2 epithelial cell line, we have investigated the use of an anti-toxin A monoclonal antibody (ATAA) in providing protection against toxin A-mediated disruption of epithelial barrier function (assessed by measurement of transepithelial electrical resistance and luminal to basolateral flux of labelled dextran). In contrast to free antibody, ATAA conjugated to sepharose beads was more effective in neutralizing the activity of purified toxin A. Sepharose bead-conjugated ATAA was subsequently used to investigate the contribution of toxin A in epithelial injury mediated by C. difficile supernatant samples (containing toxins A, B and other products). Loss of barrier function mediated by apical application of supernatant samples of reference and epidemic 027 strains of C. difficile was abrogated by neutralization of toxin A. However, this was not the case when the supernatant samples were applied to the basal surface of epithelial monolayers. In conclusion, our studies have shown that (i) sepharose bead-conjugated ATAA is more effective in neutralizing toxin A than free antibody and (ii) when the apical (luminal) surface of epithelial monolayers is exposed to the secretory products of reference and 027 strains of C. difficile, toxin A is required for the initial injury that leads to loss of barrier function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical & Experimental ImmunologySame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207