Tobramycin Pharmacokinetics in Children with Febrile Neutropenia Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation: Once‐Daily versus Thrice‐Daily Administration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetic disposition of tobramycin in children undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) after intravenous administration either every 24 hours or every 8 hours, and to use this information to create initial dosing guidelines for administration every 24 hours in this patient population. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: Sixty children (< 18 yrs) with febrile neutropenia undergoing stem cell transplantation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive intravenous tobramycin either every 24 hours (29 patients) or every 8 hours (31 patients). Initially, they received either 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 8 hours or weight-based doses by age group (< 5 yrs, 9 mg/kg/dose; 5 to < 12 yrs, 8 mg/kg/dose; > or = 12 yrs, 7 mg/kg/dose) every 24 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serum tobramycin concentrations were obtained at 2 and 8 hours after the first dose. Initial guidelines for dosing every 24 hours were derived using the parameters from all patients to achieve a maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of 20-22.5 mg/L and a drug-free interval (time during dosing interval when the tobramycin concentration was < 1 mg/L) of at least 4 hours. After the first tobramycin dose, the elimination rate constant (kel) and volume of distribution (Vd) observed in the every-8-hour group (23 patients) were 0.34 +/- 0.09 hours(-1) and 0.48 +/- 0.21 L/kg, respectively. The kel and Vd in the every-24-hour group (22 patients) were 0.43 +/- 0.12 hr(-1) and 0.43 +/- 0.26 L/kg, respectively. Tobramycin Vd varied with age. Initial doses of tobramycin every 24 hours recommended to achieve the target parameters are 10 mg/kg/dose for patients aged 6 months to less than 9 years, 8 mg/kg/dose for those aged 9 to less than 12 years, and 6 mg/kg/dose for those aged 12 years or older. CONCLUSION: Children undergoing SCT who receive tobramycin every 24 hours should receive an initial dose based on age. Further validation of the proposed dosing guidelines is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".