Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection by Directly Cytotoxic CD4 T Cells: Parallel Requirements for Fas and Perforin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD4 T cells can suffice as effector cells to mediate primary acute cardiac allograft rejection. Although CD4 T cells can readily kill appropriate target cells in vitro, the corresponding role of such cytolytic activity for mediating allograft rejection in vivo is unknown. Therefore, we determined whether the cytolytic effector molecules perforin (PFP) and/or FasL (CD95L) were necessary for CD4 T cell-mediated rejection in vivo. METHODS: Wild-type C3H(H-2) or Fas (CD95)-deficient C3Hlpr (H-2) hearts were transplanted into immune-deficient C57B6rag (H-2) mice. Then, recipients were reconstituted with naïve purified CD4 T cells from wild-type, PFP-deficient, or FasL (gld)-deficient T-cell donors. RESULTS: In vitro, alloreactive CD4 T cells were competent to lyse donor major histocompatibility complex class II+ target cells, largely by a Fas-dependent mechanism. In vivo, the individual disruption of donor Fas expression (lpr) or CD4 T-cell-derived PFP had no significant impact on acute rejection. However, FasL-deficient (gld) CD4 T cells demonstrated delayed allograft rejection. Importantly, the simultaneous removal of both donor Fas expression and CD4 T-cell PFP completely abrogated acute rejection, despite the persistence of CD4 T cells within the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that the direct rejection of cardiac allografts by CD4 effector T cells requires the alternative contribution of graft Fas expression and T cell PFP expression. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that cytolytic activity by CD4 T cells can play an obligate role for primary acute allograft rejection in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".