MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071469692 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m500028200

CSX/Nkx2.5 Modulates Differentiation of Skeletal Myoblasts and Promotes Differentiation into Neuronal Cells in Vitro

2005· article· en· W2071469692 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Riazi, Haeyul Lee, Christina Rou Hsu, Glen Van Arsdell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenSick Kids Foundation
KeywordsMyogenesisC2C12MyocyteCellular differentiationTranscription factorCardiac myocyteCell biologyBiologyGATA4Skeletal muscleEndocrinologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CSX/Nkx2.5 transcription factor plays a pivotal role in cardiac development; however, its role in development and differentiation of other organs has not been investigated. In this study, we used C2C12 myoblasts and human fetal primary myoblasts to investigate the function of Nkx2.5 in skeletal myogenesis. The expression levels of Nkx2.5 decreased as C2C12 myoblasts elongated and fused to form myotubes. The expression of human NKX2.5 in C2C12 myoblasts inhibited myocyte differentiation and myotube formation, and up-regulated Gata4 and Tbx5 expression. The expression of NKX2.5 in terminally differentiated C2C12 myotubes resulted in a change in morphology and breakdown into smaller myotubes. Furthermore, overexpression of NKX2.5 in C2C12 cells and primary cultures of human fetal myoblasts led to differentiation of myoblasts into neuron-like cells and expression of neuronal markers. This study sheds light on the previously unknown non-cardiac functions of Nkx2.5 transcription factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207